Shortcut
to Decisions
Chris
Powell is a sales executive who increased
his results from 65% to nearly 100%
when he changed the way he looked. Imagine,
for the moment, that Chris is a Realtor,
and that you will soon be re-located
to a new city and have gone there for
one week in order to buy a house. You
don't have time to waste, so you need
a Realtor who is thoroughly professional
and experienced. No part-timer or inexperienced
"greenhorn” for you! You
need an expert that you can trust. Which
of the two men would you choose?
The question could just as easily have
been, "which attorney, clothing
salesman, banker, insurance or financial
advisor would you choose?"
|
 |
Harvard
University has shown that you will size a
person up in about two seconds – and
that those impressions are lasting. And according
to Robert Cialdini, PhD, social psychologist
and author of the book, “INFLUENCE,
the Psychology of Persuasion,” we are
bombarded daily with decisions to make, and
without the time to thoroughly investigate
every situation, we use “shortcuts”
to help us choose and decide. We classify
things according to a few key features, and
then we respond mindlessly when one or another
of these trigger features is present. And
what are some of those trigger features?
Looking
good = good
Not surprisingly, we buy things from people
we like. However, social scientists have
identified a number of factors that reliably
cause liking, and they assert that good-looking
people are liked. It turns out that there
is an unconscious assumption that
looking good = good, and this becomes
a handy shortcut. Research shows
that we automatically assign to good-looking
individuals favorable traits such as talent,
kindness, honesty and intelligence. In staged
trials, when the defendant was better looking
than his victim, he was assessed a modest
sum; but when the victim
was more attractive, the sum assessed nearly
doubled. Cialdini says that juries give
more favorable treatment to good-looking
people, and that attractive defendants are
twice as likely to avoid jail as unattractive
ones. The way you look shouldn’t matter,
but it does.
Cialdini
asserts that we are not aware
that physical attractiveness plays a role
in our judgment. For example, men who saw
a new-car ad with a seductive young woman
in the ad rated the car as faster, more
appealing, more expensive looking, better
designed than did men who viewed the same
ad without the female model. Yet
when asked later, the men refused to believe
that the presence of the young woman had
influenced their judgments.
Uniforms
= Authority
Authority is another powerful “weapon
of influence.” It seems there is a
deep-seated sense of duty to authority within
us all. Two things in particular enable
a person to be deemed an authority: titles
and uniforms. Cialdini gives several examples
of doctors’ orders being obeyed “no
matter what” – even blatantly
“bad” borders. No wonder. Doctors
have not only titles but also “uniforms,”
with their white lab jackets and stethoscopes!
It turns out that guards’ uniforms
are as effective as those of a policeman
or a ship or airline captain. Cialdini cites
the case of a man dressed in a guard’s
uniform asking a passer-by to put money
in a parking meter so the car owner wouldn’t
get a ticket. His request was most often
obeyed. However, when the same man was dressed
in casual clothing and made the request
to passers-by, he was ignored. But what
about the rest of us? Cialdini asserts that
the “business suit” is also
a uniform of authority, and with the simple
act of jaywalking, passersby will blindly
follow a man in a business suit; but not
so when the same man jaywalks and is dressed
casually. No wonder corporate casual has
been such a dismal failure.
The
power of the business suit is also confirmed
by Paul Fussell in his book UNIFORMS.
He asserts that particularly powerful business
suits (for men or women) become ennobled
and convey news of valuable personal qualities
in its wearers. Unfortunately, not all “business
suits” convey the message of authority
– or “nobility.” Sadly,
TV game show hosts and Hollywood movie stars
are lauded by the public as “well
dressed,” and so they are mimicked.
While they may be “fashionably dressed”
in terms of fads, the overall effect is
generally not one of authority. But then,
TV and film stars have agents to do their
negotiating, so they don’t need to
look authoritative. The pale blue, lavender
or sage green shirts with matching ties
that are currently popular give the appearance
of a “dandy” or someone who
is a bit on the “slick” side.
Furthermore, pastels suggest passivity and
give a pale and washed out appearance. They
are more appropriate for Las Vegas than
the boardroom.
Somewhere
along the way, both men’s and women’s
business suits omitted the “business”
part of the formula. It is doubtful that
jaywalkers would follow a man dressed in
a “business” suit worn with
an icy lavender shirt and matching silk
tie, or a woman in a robot-like copy of
a man’s suit in perfectly matched
blouse, jacket and skirt/pants in a pale
pink or sage green.
Part
of the problem is that there are limited
role models and reliable sources of information
about business dress. Popular fashion magazines
for men most often feature lots of looks
that are great in Las Vegas (flashy) or
Palm Beach (pale and passive), but very
little that might actually enable one to
appear like an authority. Fashion magazines
for women feature sexy 4-inch stiletto-heeled
shoes that steal all the attention, or seductive
garments that are totally unsuited when
it comes to establishing credibility. Women
also get seduced by “pretty”
floral prints and feminine pastels, none
of which bestow authority.
When
it comes to business dress, it is best not
to deviate too far from the tried and true.
Remember, (1) the darker the color, the
higher the authority, so avoid pastels.
And, (2)“old money” is classy
and discreet, while “new money”
is flashy and garish – so stick to
small, discreet patterns when it comes to
ties for men and shirts or blouses for women.
Ties should dominate the suit and shirt,
so this is where you can express
your creativity by choosing bold colors.
For both genders, suits in solid colors
or subtle stripes are better than
those with patterns.
Consistency
Builds Trust
Dr. Cialdini offers many examples of “weapons
of influence,” and one of the most
important is consistency. Consistency is
also a vital ingredient in branding. You
can’t look professional “some
of the time.” And you can’t
look “partly” professional,
i.e., a great suit, but a powerless tie
or blouse (earrings, etc.). If one element
of your appearance appears dated, it undermines
the rest; and you will be judged to have
dated products or services. Inconsistency,
according to Cialdini, sparks feelings of
confusion and doubt, and inconsistent people
are thought to be scatterbrained and unstable.
If you look professional Monday through
Thursday, but not on Casual Friday, doubts
may unconsciously creep in. Not surprisingly,
nurses wearing assorted pastel scrubs in
endless arrays of pajama-like prints complain
about lack of respect. It is probably time
they returned to some sort of “consistent”
uniform, but not the stiffly-starched white
uniform of the past, which easily conjures
up images of Nurse Ratchet.
General
George Patton kept a personal diary and
in it noted that he did not always have
the courage that was expected of him. He
writes that he relied upon his uniform to
give him courage. You have a “uniform”
that can give you courage and authority,
just like General Patton. It is the business
suit, and with it you just might conquer
the world.
|